State v. Espy

496 P.3d 1159, 315 Or. App. 85
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 6, 2021
DocketA173561
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 496 P.3d 1159 (State v. Espy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Espy, 496 P.3d 1159, 315 Or. App. 85 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Submitted September 13, affirmed October 6, 2021, petition for review denied February 24, 2022 (369 Or 338)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHANE FRITZ ESPY, Defendant-Appellant. Josephine County Circuit Court 19CR12790; A173561 496 P3d 1159

Pat Wolke, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Neil F. Byl, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Susan G. Howe, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Redick, 312 Or App 260, 491 P3d 87 (2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jones
501 P.3d 102 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)
State v. Overgaard
496 P.3d 1159 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 P.3d 1159, 315 Or. App. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-espy-orctapp-2021.