State v. Otzoy
171 P.3d 397, 216 Or. App. 166, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1625
Opinion
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for failing to perform the duties of a driver, ORS 811.700. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress incriminating statements that were made to officers before he received Miranda warnings. The state concedes that the trial court erred and that the case should be reversed and remanded. After reviewing the record, we agree and accept the state’s concession.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Otzoy, 171 P.3d 397, 216 Or. App. 166, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1625 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
171 P.3d 397 (State v. Otzoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. OTZOY
171 P.3d 397 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)