State v. Otzoy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Otzoy

171 P.3d 397, 216 Or. App. 166, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1625

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 7, 2007

DocketZ553274; A131865

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 P.3d 397 (State v. Otzoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Otzoy, 171 P.3d 397, 216 Or. App. 166, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1625 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for failing to perform the duties of a driver, ORS 811.700. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress incriminating statements that were made to officers before he received Miranda warnings. The state concedes that the trial court erred and that the case should be reversed and remanded. After reviewing the record, we agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for failing to perform the duties of a driver, ORS 811.700. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress incriminating statements that were made to officers before he received Miranda warnings. The state concedes that the trial court erred and that the case should be reversed and remanded. After reviewing the record, we agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 P.3d 397, 216 Or. App. 166, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-otzoy-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack