State v. OREE
304 S.W.3d 295, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 288, 2010 WL 768882
Opinion
*296 ORDER
Darius Oree appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting him of trafficking in the second degree following a jury trial. Oree contends that the trial court: (1) erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence to prove that he possessed more than two grams of cocaine base, and (2) abused its discretion in overruling his objection to the State’s improper closing argument. We affirm. 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. OREE, 304 S.W.3d 295, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 288, 2010 WL 768882 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
304 S.W.3d 295 (State v. OREE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lynn v. Director of Revenue
304 S.W.3d 295 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)