Lynn v. Director of Revenue
Opinion
ORDER
Director of Revenue (“Director”)' appeals the trial court’s judgment setting aside the revocation of Gary Lynn’s driving privileges. Director contends that the trial court erred in setting aside the revocation of Lynn’s driving privileges on the grounds that he was not given twenty minutes to attempt to contact an attorney after the Implied Consent Law was read as required by section 577.041.1, RSMo Cum.Supp.2009. Director contends Lynn did not trigger the twenty-minute rule as he did not request to speak to a lawyer after the Implied Consent Law was read. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
304 S.W.3d 295 (Lynn v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.