State v. Olmstead

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Olmstead

780 P.2d 1201, 99 Or. App. 41, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1518

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 18, 1989

Docket88-11312; CA A50685

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 780 P.2d 1201 (State v. Olmstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Olmstead, 780 P.2d 1201, 99 Or. App. 41, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1518 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinions

[42]*42PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his convictions, on stipulated facts, for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and driving with a suspended license. ORS 811.182. Before trial, defendant filed notice of his intent to defend both charges by asserting that he was guilty but insane. ORS 161.295. The state moved that the defense be stricken. The court granted the state’s motion.

Defendant’s only contention is that the court erred in striking the defense. The defense under ORS 161.295 is not available, because driving under the influence of intoxicants and driving with a suspended license are both strict liability offenses. State v. Buttrey, 293 Or 575, 651 P2d 1075 (1982); State v. Maguire, 78 Or App 459, 717 P2d 226 (1986), affirmed without opinion by an equally divided court 303 Or 368 (1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[42]*42PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his convictions, on stipulated facts, for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and driving with a suspended license. ORS 811.182. Before trial, defendant filed notice of his intent to defend both charges by asserting that he was guilty but insane. ORS 161.295. The state moved that the defense be stricken. The court granted the state’s motion.

Defendant’s only contention is that the court erred in striking the defense. The defense under ORS 161.295 is not available, because driving under the influence of intoxicants and driving with a suspended license are both strict liability offenses. State v. Buttrey, 293 Or 575, 651 P2d 1075 (1982); State v. Maguire, 78 Or App 459, 717 P2d 226 (1986), affirmed without opinion by an equally divided court 303 Or 368 (1987).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

780 P.2d 1201, 99 Or. App. 41, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-olmstead-orctapp-1989.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack