State v. O'CONNOR

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. O'CONNOR

283 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 639, 2009 WL 1383612

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 19, 2009

DocketED 91641

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 301 (State v. O'CONNOR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. O'CONNOR, 283 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 639, 2009 WL 1383612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael J. O’Connor appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of six counts of first degree statutory sodomy. We find that the trial court committed no plain error.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael J. O’Connor appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of six counts of first degree statutory sodomy. We find that the trial court committed no plain error.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 639, 2009 WL 1383612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-oconnor-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack