McDaniels v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McDaniels v. State

283 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 633, 2009 WL 1383614

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 19, 2009

DocketED 91670

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 301 (McDaniels v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDaniels v. State, 283 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 633, 2009 WL 1383614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*302 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome McDaniels (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI