McDaniels v. State

283 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 633, 2009 WL 1383614
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 19, 2009·No. ED 91670·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*302 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome McDaniels (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDaniels v. State, 283 S.W.3d 301, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 633, 2009 WL 1383614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

283 S.W.3d 301 (McDaniels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. O'CONNOR
283 S.W.3d 301 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)