Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Novoa

State v. Novoa

610 A.2d 179, 223 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 245
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 25, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 610 A.2d 179 (State v. Novoa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Novoa, 610 A.2d 179, 223 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 245 (Colo. 1992).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 596, is granted, limited to the following question:

Bruce A. Sturman, public defender, in support of the petition. Kevin T. Kane, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided June 25, 1992
“In the circumstances of this case, was the use of wiretap evidence permitted by the provisions of General Statutes §§ 54-41p (b) and 54-41b?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Novoa
618 A.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 A.2d 179, 223 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-novoa-conn-1992.