State v. NOLE

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. NOLE

348 S.W.3d 146, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1217, 2011 WL 4356214

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 20, 2011

DocketWD 72479

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 S.W.3d 146 (State v. NOLE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. NOLE, 348 S.W.3d 146, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1217, 2011 WL 4356214 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlie David Nole appeals from his conviction of one count of maintaining a public nuisance. He contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion for a continuance after the State filed a substitute information, which eliminated an additional charge of maintaining a public nuisance, on the day of trial. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlie David Nole appeals from his conviction of one count of maintaining a public nuisance. He contends the circuit court erred in denying his motion for a continuance after the State filed a substitute information, which eliminated an additional charge of maintaining a public nuisance, on the day of trial. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 S.W.3d 146, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1217, 2011 WL 4356214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nole-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack