Hughes v. State

348 S.W.3d 146, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1216, 2011 WL 4356216
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 20, 2011
DocketWD 72516
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 348 S.W.3d 146 (Hughes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. State, 348 S.W.3d 146, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1216, 2011 WL 4356216 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Hughes appeals from the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of *147 fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. NOLE
348 S.W.3d 146 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 S.W.3d 146, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1216, 2011 WL 4356216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-state-moctapp-2011.