State v. Nguyen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Nguyen

215 P.3d 928, 230 Or. App. 490

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 26, 2009

Docket061035739 A137453

StatusPublished

This text of 215 P.3d 928 (State v. Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Nguyen, 215 P.3d 928, 230 Or. App. 490 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

215 P.3d 928 (2009) 230 Or. App. 490

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Teresa Hienvothi NGUYEN, Defendant-Respondent.

061035739; A137453.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted on July 30, 2009. Decided August 26, 2009.

Christina M. Hutchins, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Rebecca Duncan, Assistant Chief Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DEITS, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Kirkeby, 220 Or.App. 177, 185 P.3d 510, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008); State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

215 P.3d 928 (2009) 230 Or. App. 490

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Teresa Hienvothi NGUYEN, Defendant-Respondent.

061035739; A137453.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted on July 30, 2009. Decided August 26, 2009.

Christina M. Hutchins, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Rebecca Duncan, Assistant Chief Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DEITS, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Kirkeby, 220 Or.App. 177, 185 P.3d 510, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008); State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 P.3d 928, 230 Or. App. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nguyen-orctapp-2009.

Opinion

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Teresa Hienvothi NGUYEN, Defendant-Respondent.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Teresa Hienvothi NGUYEN, Defendant-Respondent.