State v. Neal

654 P.2d 663, 60 Or. App. 322, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4148
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Neal. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 Or. App. 816
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 10, 1982·No. No. 10-80-06677, CA A21140·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant assigns three errors on this appeal from his conviction for rape. First, he contends that his 20-year sentence, with the requirement that he serve a minimum of 10 years before being considered for parole, is cruel and unusual punishment. It is not.

In the second and third, he contends the trial court erred in refusing to provide a transcript on appeal at public expense. Defendant’s appeal is from the sentencing order entered on April 28, 1981. The order denying his motion for a transcript was entered on June 2, 1981. Because the order denying a transcript is not an “intermediate” order under ORS 138.040, the issue defendant raises is not before us. SER Acocella v. Allen, 288 Or 175, 604 P2d 391 (1979); State v. Montgomery, 58 Or App 630, 650 P2d 111 (1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Neal, 654 P.2d 663, 60 Or. App. 322, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4148 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

654 P.2d 663 (State v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Acocella v. Allen
604 P.2d 391 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Sidney Darrell Montgomery
650 P.2d 111 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)