State v. Neal
650 P.2d 187, 59 Or. App. 129, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3789
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Neal. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 Or. App. 816 →
Opinion
Defendant assigns three errors on this appeal from his conviction for rape. First, he contends that his 20-year sentence, with the requirement that he serve a minimum of 10 years before being considered for parole, is cruel and unusual punishment. It is not.
In the second and third, he contends the trial court erred in refusing to provide a transcript on appeal at public expense. We find no error. SER Acocella v. Allen, 288 Or 175, 604 P2d 391 (1979).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Neal, 650 P.2d 187, 59 Or. App. 129, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3789 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
650 P.2d 187 (State v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Acocella v. Allen
604 P.2d 391 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)