Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Nathan J.

State v. Nathan J.

924 A.2d 139, 282 Conn. 913, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 219
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 8, 2007
DocketSC 17903
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 924 A.2d 139 (State v. Nathan J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Nathan J., 924 A.2d 139, 282 Conn. 913, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 219 (Colo. 2007).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 99 Conn. App. 713 (AC 26194), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude, that as a matter of law, the parental justification defense under General Statutes § 53a-18 (1) applies to the charge of risk of injury to a child under General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (1)?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ under the facts of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to an instruction on that defense?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. NATHAN J.
982 A.2d 1067 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
924 A.2d 139, 282 Conn. 913, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nathan-j-conn-2007.