State v. Nathan J.

924 A.2d 139, 282 Conn. 913, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 219
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 8, 2007·No. SC 17903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 99 Conn. App. 713 (AC 26194), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude, that as a matter of law, the parental justification defense under General Statutes § 53a-18 (1) applies to the charge of risk of injury to a child under General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (1)?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ under the facts of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to an instruction on that defense?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nathan J., 924 A.2d 139, 282 Conn. 913, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 219 (Colo. 2007).

924 A.2d 139 (State v. Nathan J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. NATHAN J.
982 A.2d 1067 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)