State v. Nakano

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Nakano. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Haw. 1
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000106·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000106 05-JUL-2013 02:19 PM

SCWC-12-0000106

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

DANIEL S. NAKANO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000106; CASE NO. 1DTA-11-02743)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Daniel S. Nakano’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on May 28, 2013, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 5, 2013.

Samuel P. King, Jr., /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nakano, (haw 2013).

State v. Nakano (State v. Nakano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.