State v. Nakano
This text of State v. Nakano (State v. Nakano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000106 05-JUL-2013 02:19 PM
SCWC-12-0000106
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.
DANIEL S. NAKANO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000106; CASE NO. 1DTA-11-02743)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Daniel S. Nakano’s
application for writ of certiorari filed on May 28, 2013, is
hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 5, 2013.
Samuel P. King, Jr., /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Nakano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nakano-haw-2013.