State v. Murphy

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Murphy

260 S.W.3d 929, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1171, 2008 WL 4058090

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 2, 2008

DocketED 90072

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 S.W.3d 929 (State v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Murphy, 260 S.W.3d 929, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1171, 2008 WL 4058090 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Oscar Murphy appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Oscar Murphy appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 S.W.3d 929, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1171, 2008 WL 4058090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-murphy-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack