State v. Hamby

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hamby

260 S.W.3d 929, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2008 WL 4058091

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2008·No. ED 89899·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William B. Hamby appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of stealing, resisting arrest, and third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on *930 appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William B. Hamby appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of stealing, resisting arrest, and third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on *930 appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b)

State v. Hamby, 260 S.W.3d 929, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2008 WL 4058091 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

260 S.W.3d 929 (State v. Hamby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related