State v. Hamby

260 S.W.3d 929, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2008 WL 4058091
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 2, 2008
DocketED 89899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 260 S.W.3d 929 (State v. Hamby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hamby, 260 S.W.3d 929, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2008 WL 4058091 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William B. Hamby appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of stealing, resisting arrest, and third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on *930 appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamby v. State
309 S.W.3d 387 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
State v. Murphy
260 S.W.3d 929 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.W.3d 929, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2008 WL 4058091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hamby-moctapp-2008.