State v. Murphy

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Murphy

906 S.W.2d 415, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 2127, 1995 WL 565031

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Murphy. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 1995·No. Nos. 65000, 66992·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant was convicted of distributing a controlled substance within 1000 feet of a school in violation of § 195.214, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years. Thereafter, defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion which was denied without an evidentiary hearing. He appeals.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant was convicted of distributing a controlled substance within 1000 feet of a school in violation of § 195.214, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years. Thereafter, defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion which was denied without an evidentiary hearing. He appeals.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Murphy, 906 S.W.2d 415, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 2127, 1995 WL 565031 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

906 S.W.2d 415 (State v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.