State v. Murphy

948 S.W.2d 258, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 1997 WL 369934
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 1997·No. Nos. 67301, 70761·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after his conviction by a jury for robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. The court found defendant to be a prior offender and sentenced him to consecutive prison terms of life imprisonment for robbery and twenty years for armed criminal action. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

[259] We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Murphy, 948 S.W.2d 258, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 1997 WL 369934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

948 S.W.2d 258 (State v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
988 S.W.2d 654 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999)