State v. Murdock

9 Mo. 730
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJanuary 15, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 9 Mo. 730 (State v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Murdock, 9 Mo. 730 (Mo. 1846).

Opinion

Scott, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Murdock was indicted and convicted for having in his possession counterfeit coins, with intent to utter them as true. The offence was not charged to have been done feloniously, nor was that word used in the indictment. The judgment was arrested, and the State has sued out this writ of error.

The having in one’s possession counterfeit coins, with intent to utter them as true, is made a felony by our statute. Every offence which is [732]*732made a felony by statute, must be charged to have been done feloniously, whether it was a felony by' common law or not. The word feloni-ously is indispensably necessary in all indictments for felony; whether statutory or by common law.

The other Judges concurring, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McGrath
128 S.W. 966 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
State v. Clayton
100 Mo. 516 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)
State v. Deffenbacher
51 Mo. 26 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1872)
State v. Gilbert
24 Mo. 380 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Mo. 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-murdock-mo-1846.