State v. Deffenbacher

51 Mo. 26
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 51 Mo. 26 (State v. Deffenbacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Deffenbacher, 51 Mo. 26 (Mo. 1872).

Opinion

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is unnecessary to examine the objections urged to the rulings of the court on the trial, as we think the indictment is defective, and the motion in arrest should haye been sustained. The defend[27]*27ant was indicted under the statute (Wagn. Stat. 462, § 55) for willfully and maliciously lulling a hull; but there was no allegation in the indictment that the act was done feloniously.

The section provides that upon conviction the punishment for the act shall be as declared in the next preceding section; namely, “Imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding three years, or in the county jail not less than six months, or by fine not less than $250, or by both a fine not less than $100, and imprisonment in the county jail not less than three months.”

The term “felony,” when used in the statute, is “construed, to mean any offense for which the offender, on conviction, shall be liable, by law, to be punished with death or imprisonment in the penitentiary, and no others.” (Wagn. Stat. 516, § 38.)

This provision was construed in the case of Johnson v. The State, 7 Mo. 183, and it was held that a Statutory felony is an offense for which a party, on conviction, may be imprisoned in the penitentiary, and not where, on conviction, he must be so imprisoned.

It is the settled law of this State that an offense which is made felony by statute, whether it were a felony at common law or not, must be charged to have been committed feloniously. (The State v. Murdock, 9 Mo. 730.) The word “feloniously” is indispensably necessary in all indictments for felony.

As the indictment was for a felony, and did not charge that •the offense was feloniously committed, it was obviously bad, and the court erred in not sustaining the motion in arrest of judgment. For which reason the judgment will be reversed and the defendant discharged.

Judge Adams concurs. Judge Bliss absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Vonderau
438 S.W.2d 271 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1969)
State v. Pryor
119 S.W.2d 253 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1938)
State v. Bennett
248 S.W. 924 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1923)
State v. Whalen
248 S.W. 931 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1923)
State v. McGrath
128 S.W. 966 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
State v. Willard
119 S.W. 416 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
State v. Feazell
33 S.W. 788 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
State v. Fairlamb
25 S.W. 895 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
State v. Melton
23 S.W. 889 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
State v. Melton
53 Mo. App. 646 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Kaelin v. Commonwealth
1 S.W. 594 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1886)
State v. Weldon
70 Mo. 572 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Mo. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-deffenbacher-mo-1872.