State v. Mourning

723 A.2d 316, 247 Conn. 634, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 7
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 25, 1999·No. SC 15913·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a certified appeal; State v. Mourning, 244 Conn. 924, 714 A.2d 11 (1998); from the judgment of the Appellate Court; State v. Mourning, 47 Conn. App. 916, 703 A.2d 1194 (1997); affirming the trial court’s judgment, dated November 16,1996, finding the defendant in violation of probation and imposing the previously suspended three year sentence of incarceration. The defendant has, therefore, been incarcerated since that date. We have determined, for reasons that will appear in a full opinion to be released subsequently,1 that the dispositional phase of the probation revocation proceeding was flawed and that, therefore, that aspect of the judgment must be reversed and a new dispositional hearing held. See State v. Strickland, 243 Conn. 339, 703 A.2d 109 (1997). In order to give full effect to our determination, however, it is necessary that the defendant’s incarceration be terminated immediately, pending the new dispositional hearing.2

The judgment of the Appellate Court is reversed and the case is remanded to that court with direction (1) to reverse the judgment of the trial court in part and (2) to remand the case to the trial court for a new dispositional hearing.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mourning, 723 A.2d 316, 247 Conn. 634, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 7 (Colo. 1999).

723 A.2d 316 (State v. Mourning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delgado v. Commissioner of Correction
224 Conn. App. 283 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2024)
State v. Mourning
733 A.2d 181 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)