State v. Morris

668 S.E.2d 900
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 10, 2008
Docket2P05-3
StatusPublished

This text of 668 S.E.2d 900 (State v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Morris, 668 S.E.2d 900 (N.C. 2008).

Opinion

668 S.E.2d 900 (2008)

STATE
v.
Philip MORRIS, et al.

No. 2P05-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 10, 2008.

Michael T. Medford, Judson A. Welborn, Raleigh, Alexander Shaknes, New York, NY, James D. Mathias, Brett Ingerman, Baltimore, MD, Thomas J. Frederick, for Philip Morris.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Raleigh, Thomas D. Schroeder, W. David Edwards, Winston-Salem, Stephen Ray Patton, for R.J. Reynolds.

Jim W. Philips, Jr., Andrew J. Haile, Greensboro, Penny Reid, Idit Froim, New York, NY, for Lorillard.

Mark A. Ash, Clifton L. Brinson, Raleigh, Elizabeth McCallum, Robert Brookhiser, Washington, DC, for SPMs.

Keith Johnson, Raleigh, for SPM VIBO.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 666 S.E.2d 783.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of November 2008 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

*901 "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of November 2008."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
666 S.E.2d 783 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 S.E.2d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morris-nc-2008.