Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Morris

State v. Morris

676 S.E.2d 52, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 226, 2009 WL 824729
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 19, 2009
Docket2A05-4
StatusPublished

This text of 676 S.E.2d 52 (State v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Morris, 676 S.E.2d 52, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 226, 2009 WL 824729 (N.C. 2009).

Opinion

676 S.E.2d 52 (2009)

STATE
v.
PHILIP MORRIS, et al.

No. 2A05-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 19, 2009.

David S. Lapp, Craig A. Nielsen, Assistant Attorney Generals, for State of Maryland.

Joel M. Ressler, Chief Deputy Attorney General, for State of Pennsylvania.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Greensboro, Charles F. Marshall, III, Raleigh, for Lorillard.

Gregory G. Holland, Greensboro, Larry B. Sitton, Jonathan Heyl, Charlotte, for Philip Morris USA.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of January 2009 by Plaintiffs for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Marlene Trestman:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of March 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
676 S.E.2d 52, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 226, 2009 WL 824729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-morris-nc-2009.