State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Moore

DecidedFebruary 12, 2008

Docket2008-UP-102

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Moore (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moore, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Frank Moore, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-102
Submitted February 1, 2008 Filed February 12, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Frank Moore (Appellant) was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and failure to stop for a blue light. He was sentenced to twenty-five years in prison and a fine of $50,000 for trafficking and a concurrent term of three years in prison for failure to stop. On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final brief along with a petition to be relieved as counsel. Appellant has not filed a pro se response. After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] This case is decided without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Frank Moore, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-102
Submitted February 1, 2008 Filed February 12, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Frank Moore (Appellant) was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and failure to stop for a blue light. He was sentenced to twenty-five years in prison and a fine of $50,000 for trafficking and a concurrent term of three years in prison for failure to stop. On appeal, counsel for Appellant has filed a final brief along with a petition to be relieved as counsel. Appellant has not filed a pro se response. After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] This case is decided without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Moore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moore-scctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack