State v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Moore

881 N.E.2d 860, 117 Ohio St. 3d 69

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 2008

DocketNo. 2006-0502

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 881 N.E.2d 860 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moore, 881 N.E.2d 860, 117 Ohio St. 3d 69 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} As to Proposition of Law No. II of the cross-appeal, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for cross-appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for cross-appellant.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. Ill of the cross-appeal, the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in State v. Crager, 116 Ohio St.3d 369, 2007-Ohio-6840, 879 N.E.2d 745.

{¶ 3} As to Proposition of Law No. VII of the cross-appeal, the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Moyek, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI