State v. Moore

881 N.E.2d 860, 117 Ohio St. 3d 69
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 13, 2008·No. No. 2006-0502·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} As to Proposition of Law No. II of the cross-appeal, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for cross-appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for cross-appellant.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. Ill of the cross-appeal, the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in State v. Crager, 116 Ohio St.3d 369, 2007-Ohio-6840, 879 N.E.2d 745.

{¶ 3} As to Proposition of Law No. VII of the cross-appeal, the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Moyek, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moore, 881 N.E.2d 860, 117 Ohio St. 3d 69 (Ohio 2008).

881 N.E.2d 860 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moore
925 N.E.2d 692 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)
State v. Moore, 85828 (5-15-2008)
2008 Ohio 2359 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)