State v. Moore

354 S.W.3d 257, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1650, 2011 WL 6209747
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2011·No. ED 95497·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Montrell Moore appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree murder, abuse of a child resulting in death, endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree, possession of a controlled substance, possession of marijuana under 35 grams, and possession of drug paraphernalia. We find that the trial court did not err failing to strike venireperson Raymond for cause and in admitting autopsy photographs of the victim. We also find that the allegedly erroneous admission of testimony relating to Moore’s prior bad acts did not result in prejudice. Finally, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Moore’s motion for a new trial.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moore, 354 S.W.3d 257, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1650, 2011 WL 6209747 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

354 S.W.3d 257 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. State
431 S.W.3d 15 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. SAHNO
354 S.W.3d 257 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)