State v. SAHNO

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. SAHNO

354 S.W.3d 257, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1652, 2011 WL 6209994

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2011·No. ED 96070·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nicolas M. Sahno appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for attempted burglary in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, stealing, and property damage in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. Am extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nicolas M. Sahno appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for attempted burglary in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, stealing, and property damage in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. Am extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2011).

State v. SAHNO, 354 S.W.3d 257, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1652, 2011 WL 6209994 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

354 S.W.3d 257 (State v. SAHNO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related