State v. Moore

241 S.W.3d 422, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1721, 2007 WL 4392970
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2007·No. ED 88973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony G. Moore appeals the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary, stealing, resisting arrest, three counts of attempted rape, and three counts of forcible sodomy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Moore, 241 S.W.3d 422, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1721, 2007 WL 4392970 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

241 S.W.3d 422 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvell v. State
241 S.W.3d 422 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)