State v. Moore

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Moore

239 S.W.3d 150, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1619, 2007 WL 4165961

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 27, 2007

DocketED 88752

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 S.W.3d 150 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Moore, 239 S.W.3d 150, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1619, 2007 WL 4165961 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

*151 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrell C. Moore (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction of first degree robbery in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. On appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress an out-of-court identification and in excluding the testimony of his wife and his brother’s girlfriend, who would have testified as to his whereabouts on the day of the crime.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI