State v. Moore

213 S.W.3d 95, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 2006 WL 3361558

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 690 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2006·No. WD 66073·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Moore was convicted of kidnapping, section 565.110 1 ; burglary in the first degree, section 569.160; robbery in the second degree, section 569.030; forcible rape, section 566.030; three counts of forcible sodomy, section 566.060; felonious restraint, section 565.120; and harassment, section 565.090. Mr. Moore appeals the convictions for felonious restraint and harassment, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to prove these offenses.

*96 For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000) and the cumulative supplement (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

*96 For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000) and the cumulative supplement (2005).

State v. Moore, 213 S.W.3d 95, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733, 2006 WL 3361558 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

213 S.W.3d 95 (State v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.