State v. Mooney
This text of 2020 ND 127 (State v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 06/02/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 127
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Archie Allen Mooney, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20190333
Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Joshua B. Rustad, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Mooney No. 20190333
[¶1] Archie Mooney appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of multiple drug related offenses. Mooney argues the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mooney-nd-2020.