State v. Mooney
Opinion
Filed 1/19/05 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2005 ND 1
Danielle Greybull, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20040254
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Danielle Greybull (on brief), pro se, 1010 W. 6 th Avenue, Shakopee, MN 55379, petitioner and appellant.
Cynthia M. Feland (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer, Bismarck, ND 58501-4413, for respondent and appellee.
Greybull v. State
No. 20040254
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Danielle Greybull appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her petition for post-conviction relief. Greybull argues Blakely v. Washington , 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004) supports her position that the holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000) should be applied retroactively to her case. The district court dismissed her petition, finding this Court had already addressed this issue in Greybull v. State , 2004 ND 116, 680 N.W.2d 254.
[¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2005 ND 6 (State v. Mooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.