Greybull v. State
This text of 2005 ND 1 (Greybull v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 1/19/05 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2005 ND 6
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
William Mooney, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20040180-182
Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable M. Richard Geiger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Sarah Elizabeth Cannon (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, 600 Cooper Avenue, Grafton, N.D. 57237, for plaintiff and appellee.
DeWayne Johnston (appeared), and Sandra Hagen (argued), third-year law student, Olson Johnston Law Office, 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 100A, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Mooney
[¶1] William Mooney appealed from three criminal judgments, contending the trial court erred in allowing testimony about a statement he made. The judgments are affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2005 ND 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greybull-v-state-nd-2005.