State v. Montoya
This text of 2014 Ohio 848 (State v. Montoya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Montoya, 138 Ohio St.3d 345, 2014-Ohio-848.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MONTOYA, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Montoya, 138 Ohio St.3d 345, 2014-Ohio-848.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Miranda. (No. 2013-1344—Submitted February 26, 2013—Decided March 13, 2014.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, No. CA2012-02-015, 2013-Ohio-3312. ____________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Miranda, 138 Ohio St.3d 184, 2014-Ohio-451, 5 N.E.3d 603. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. ____________________ Vincent Faris, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, and Judith Brant, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Peter Galyardt, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. _________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-montoya-ohio-2014.