State v. Montoya

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 35,347

5 CHRISTINA MONTOYA,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SIERRA COUNTY 8 Matthew G. Reynolds, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Joseph Sullivan 13 Albuquerque, NM

14 for Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 VIGIL, Chief Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ 10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

11 12 _________________________________ 13 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge