State v. Montoya

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 33,229

5 JOE ANTHONY MONTOYA and 6 MARLENE MONTOYA,

7 Defendants-Appellants.

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 9 James A. Hall, District Judge

10 Gary K. King, Attorney General 11 Santa Fe, NM

12 for Appellee

13 Bregman & Loman, P.C. 14 Sam Bregman 15 Eric Loman 16 Albuquerque, NM

17 for Appellants

18 MEMORANDUM OPINION

19 ZAMORA, Judge. 1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} DISMISSED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________ 7 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ 10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

11 _________________________________ 12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge