Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/State v. Mitchell

State v. Mitchell

689 S.E.2d 638, 386 S.C. 597
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 16, 2010
Docket26772
StatusPublished

This text of 689 S.E.2d 638 (State v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mitchell, 689 S.E.2d 638, 386 S.C. 597 (S.C. 2010).

Opinion

386 S.C. 597 (2010)
689 S.E.2d 638

The STATE, Petitioner,
v.
Hercules E. MITCHELL, Respondent.

No. 26772.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard January 20, 2010.
Decided February 16, 2010.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General S. Creighton Waters, all of Columbia, and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Petitioner.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Respondent.

*598 PER CURIAM.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals decision in State v. Mitchell, 378 S.C. 305, 662 S.E.2d 493 (Ct.App.2008). After a thorough review of the Appendix, record, and briefs, the writ of certiorari is

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mitchell
662 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008)
State v. Mitchell
689 S.E.2d 638 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 S.E.2d 638, 386 S.C. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mitchell-sc-2010.