State v. Mita
Opinion
a LAvv Lzes»v:@
NO. 29347
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAfI
STATE oF HAWAI‘I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee§;§€ § » - ca vs. §§ WANDA RURIKO MITA, ReSpondent/Defendant-Appel 53 §§ `“”"
l.Z
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPE§HS (HPD CRIMINAL NO. l64978DL) , ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, J., for the court1 and Acoba, J., dissenting) Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii's
application for writ of cerfiorari filed on June 10, 20l0, is
hereby acceoted. Honolulu, HawaFi, July 27, 20lO.
IWHEED: FOR THE COURT:
/’Yl»wv="
Associate Justice
(Y` § § z § r\
Peter B. Carlisle, . Prosecuting Attorney, and
James M. Anderson, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney,
on the application for petitioner/plaintiff-
appellee.
and Recktenwald,
1 ConSidered by: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, Duffy, C.J., recused.
JJ , and Circuit Judge Lee in place of Moon,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mita (State v. Mita) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.