State v. MINICKY

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. MINICKY

347 S.W.3d 509, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 688, 2011 WL 1875292

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 2011·No. ED 94229·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Mark Anthony Minicky, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of section 566.062 RSMo (2000), on which he was sentenced to a term of ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Mark Anthony Minicky, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of section 566.062 RSMo (2000), on which he was sentenced to a term of ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. MINICKY, 347 S.W.3d 509, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 688, 2011 WL 1875292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

347 S.W.3d 509 (State v. MINICKY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related