Jayne v. OCCIDENTAL FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA

347 S.W.3d 509, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 734
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 31, 2011·No. ED 94550·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. of North Carolina (Occidental) appeals the trial court’s decision granting David and Ruth Jaynes’ (Plaintiffs) motion for judgment on the pleadings in Plaintiffs’ equitable garnishment action. Occidental claims the trial court erred in granting Plaintiffs’ mo *510 tion for judgment on the pleadings and also contends that the trial court erred in calculating post-judgment interest on Plaintiffs’ judgment through the date of the judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value.

We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jayne v. OCCIDENTAL FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, 347 S.W.3d 509, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

347 S.W.3d 509 (Jayne v. OCCIDENTAL FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. MINICKY
347 S.W.3d 509 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)