State v. Miner

606 S.W.2d 448, 1980 Mo. App. LEXIS 3326
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 1, 1980
DocketNo. 11748
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 606 S.W.2d 448 (State v. Miner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Miner, 606 S.W.2d 448, 1980 Mo. App. LEXIS 3326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

GREENE, Judge.

Defendant Ricky Lynn Miner was charged by felony information with first degree burglary. A jury convicted him of the lesser included offense of second degree burglary, and recommended 2½ years imprisonment as punishment. The trial court granted a new trial because of instructional error. Defendant was then retried under the first degree burglary information. The jury again returned a verdict of guilty of second degree burglary, and recommended as punishment confinement in the county jail for one year. This appeal followed.

The record on appeal in this case is fatally deficient, as it does not contain a judgment. A copy of the judgment must be included in the record on appeal, as the entry of judgment triggers the appellate process. State v. Hagar, 561 S.W.2d 444-445 (Mo.App.1978); State v. Wilke, 560 S.W.2d 601, 602 (Mo.App.1978). In the record, appellant has designated as a judgment a handwritten entry in the trial court’s minutes dated 3/21/80, which merely recites that the defendant was granted allocution, and that it was the judgment and sentence of the court that defendant be confined in the Crawford County jail for a period of [449]*449one year in accordance with the verdict of the jury finding defendant guilty of burglary in the second degree. Such a docket entry cannot be transmogrified into a judgment merely because the defendant calls it one. State v. Pogue, 552 S.W.2d 75, 76 (Mo.App.1977). The docket entry fails to constitute rendition of a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken.

The appeal is dismissed as premature, and the cause remanded to the trial court for rendition and entry of a final judgment, State v. Preston, 563 S.W.2d 98, 99 (Mo. App.1978), after which defendant may, if he chooses, file a new notice of appeal. State v. Myers, 467 S.W.2d 577 (Mo.App.1971).

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Missouri v. Jarrad Ryan Vandergrift
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2022
State v. Paul
401 S.W.3d 591 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013)
Bowers v. State
330 S.W.3d 832 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Hawthorne
276 S.W.3d 916 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
City of Neosho v. Doyle
52 S.W.3d 651 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)
State v. Nenninger
50 S.W.3d 368 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
606 S.W.2d 448, 1980 Mo. App. LEXIS 3326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miner-moctapp-1980.