State v. Hawthorne

276 S.W.3d 916, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 286, 2009 WL 405832
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 2009
DocketSD 29036
StatusPublished

This text of 276 S.W.3d 916 (State v. Hawthorne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hawthorne, 276 S.W.3d 916, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 286, 2009 WL 405832 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

Charles G. Hawthorne undertakes to appeal this court-tried criminal case. The appeal must be dismissed.

Rule 30.04 prescribes what is required in the record on appeal that must be filed in the appeal of a criminal case. The record on appeal is divided into two components, the legal file and the transcript. Rule 30.04(a). “The legal file component of the record on appeal must include a copy of the judgment and sentence. Rule 30.04(a). Rule 29.07(c) requires that a judgment of conviction ‘set forth the plea, the verdict or findings, and the adjudication and sentence.’ ” State v. Nenninger, 50 S.W.3d 368, 369 (Mo.App.2001). See also City of Neosho v. Doyle, 52 S.W.3d 651 (Mo.App.2001); State v. Miner, 606 S.W.2d 448 (Mo.App.1980). The record on appeal in this case does not include a final judgment. The appeal is dismissed.

LYNCH, C.J., and RAHMEYER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Miner
606 S.W.2d 448 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
State v. Nenninger
50 S.W.3d 368 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)
City of Neosho v. Doyle
52 S.W.3d 651 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 S.W.3d 916, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 286, 2009 WL 405832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hawthorne-moctapp-2009.