State v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mills

303 S.W.3d 655, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 218, 2010 WL 624022

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketED 93114

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.W.3d 655 (State v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mills, 303 S.W.3d 655, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 218, 2010 WL 624022 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

*656 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ramey Leelyn Mills (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment upon his conviction by a jury of attempted stealing, in violation of sections 570.030 and 564.011 1 . The trial court sentenced Defendant to fifteen days in the Audrain County jail but suspended the execution of sentence, placed Defendant on two years of probation, and imposed a $200 fíne. We affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this ease would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for the parties’ use only, which sets forth the reason for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI