Meyer v. COUNTRYSIDE HILL SUBDIVISION

Missouri Court of Appeals

Meyer v. COUNTRYSIDE HILL SUBDIVISION

303 S.W.3d 655, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 194, 2010 WL 624017

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketED 93148

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.W.3d 655 (Meyer v. COUNTRYSIDE HILL SUBDIVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. COUNTRYSIDE HILL SUBDIVISION, 303 S.W.3d 655, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 194, 2010 WL 624017 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angela and Donald Meyer (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of Countryside Hill Subdivision (“the Subdivision”) on their petition alleging negligence, strict liability, and negligence per se. 1 We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the Subdivision.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Plaintiffs' petition also contained a count titled "nuisance”; however, Plaintiffs do not present any arguments on appeal challenging summary judgment in favor of the Subdivision on this specific count.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI