State v. Miller

297 S.W.3d 674, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1651, 2009 WL 4250583
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 1, 2009·No. WD 69918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*675 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Brian K. Miller appeals his conviction for possession of child pornography, § 573.037, RSMo 2000. In his sole Point Relied On, Miller argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress the evidence of child pornography found on his computer. Miller contends that his consent to law enforcement’s seizure of the computer was coerced by their statement that if he refused consent, they would have to obtain a search warrant. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Miller, 297 S.W.3d 674, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1651, 2009 WL 4250583 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

297 S.W.3d 674 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fischer v. Fischer
297 S.W.3d 674 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)