State v. Miller

247 S.W.3d 606, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 356, 2008 WL 710012
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 2008·No. ED 89292·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Miller appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of statutory rape in the second degree. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Miller’s request for a mistrial.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Miller, 247 S.W.3d 606, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 356, 2008 WL 710012 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

247 S.W.3d 606 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DROEGE v. Norman
247 S.W.3d 606 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)