DROEGE v. Norman

247 S.W.3d 606, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 361, 2008 WL 708792
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 2008·No. ED 88821·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Thomas D. Norman appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondent William J. Droege awarding $4,847.62 in damages and interest on the parties’ contract for chiropractic services. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DROEGE v. Norman, 247 S.W.3d 606, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 361, 2008 WL 708792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

247 S.W.3d 606 (DROEGE v. Norman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Miller
247 S.W.3d 606 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)