DROEGE v. Norman
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant Thomas D. Norman appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondent William J. Droege awarding $4,847.62 in damages and interest on the parties’ contract for chiropractic services. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
247 S.W.3d 606 (DROEGE v. Norman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.