DROEGE v. Norman
This text of 247 S.W.3d 606 (DROEGE v. Norman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant Thomas D. Norman appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondent William J. Droege awarding $4,847.62 in damages and interest on the parties’ contract for chiropractic services. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 S.W.3d 606, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 361, 2008 WL 708792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/droege-v-norman-moctapp-2008.