State v. Miller

618 So. 2d 399, 1993 La. LEXIS 1571, 1993 WL 138555
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 So. 2d 603
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 30, 1993·No. No. 93-KK-1103·Published

Opinion

In re Miller, Robert; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial [400]*400writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 93-KW-0252; Parish of St. Charles, Twenty-Ninth Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 91-0401.

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted in part, denied in part.

The court of appeal properly vacated the portion of the discovery order which authorized the taking of the deputy’s deposition. The trial court did not otherwise abuse its discretion in granting defendant’s discovery requests. The order of the court of appeal is, therefore, vacated and the ruling of the trial court is reinstated except as to the portion of the ruling which authorizes the taking of the deposition.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Miller, 618 So. 2d 399, 1993 La. LEXIS 1571, 1993 WL 138555 (La. 1993).

618 So. 2d 399 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.