State v. Miller

605 So. 2d 1106, 1992 La. LEXIS 2999, 1992 WL 278328
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 So. 2d 603
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 9, 1992·No. No. 91-KH-1050·Published

Opinion

In re Miller, Marvin; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 251-951.

Granted. Relator’s sentence is vacated and this case is remanded for resentencing with relator present according to the procedures set forth in State v. Husband, 593 So.2d 1257 (La.1992); State v. Desdunes, 579 So.2d 452 (La.1991). If the district court cannot determine the intent of the original sentencing judge, the court should make an independent determination of an appropriate sentence, not to exceed the original in term of years, to be served without benefit of parole, in accord with the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Louisiana Sentencing Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Miller, 605 So. 2d 1106, 1992 La. LEXIS 2999, 1992 WL 278328 (La. 1992).

605 So. 2d 1106 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Husband
593 So. 2d 1257 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)
State v. Desdunes
579 So. 2d 452 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991)